Tindak Tutur Direktif dan Strategi Bertutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Teks Tanggapan di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 38 Padang

Authors

  • Elfira Rahma Liza Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
  • Ena Noveria Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i1.132

Keywords:

directive speech acts, speaking strategies, response text learning

Abstract

Instructional Speech Actions and Teachers' Speaking Strategies in Response Text Learning in Grade VII SMP Negeri 38 Padang

This study was motivated by the importance of teacher language as a pedagogical tool in learning, particularly in directing, controlling, and developing students’ learning interactions in response text instruction. The study aimed to describe the forms of teachers’ directive speech acts, the speaking strategies used by the teacher, and the most dominant type of directive speech act in teaching response texts to seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 38 Padang. This research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. The data consisted of the Indonesian language teacher’s oral utterances collected through non-participant observation, recording, and note-taking techniques. The data were analyzed through transcription, identification, classification, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that there were 366 directive utterances consisting of six forms, namely requests (9 utterances), questions (181 utterances), commands (61 utterances), prohibitions (29 utterances), permissions (74 utterances), and advice (12 utterances). The most dominant form was questioning. In addition, four speaking strategies were identified, namely bald on-record strategy (240 utterances), positive politeness strategy (19 utterances), negative politeness strategy (86 utterances), and off-record strategy (21 utterances). The most dominant strategy was bald on-record. These findings indicate that the teacher’s utterances in response text learning emphasize clarity, firmness, and efficiency, while still considering politeness and interpersonal relations in classroom interaction.

References

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Diana, R. E., & Manaf, N. A. (2022). Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Bahasa Indonesia pada Proses Pembelajaran di SMP. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4940– 4952.

Dwita, N. F., & Atmazaki. (2024). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 16135–16146.

Fadhila, W., & Anggraini, D. (2024). Tindak tutur direktif guru dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 5682–5691.

Fildzah, F. H., & Triana, H. (2025). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dan Strategi Bertutur Guru pada Pembelajaran Teks Resensi Siswa Kelas XI.4 Fase F SMA Negeri 1 Payakumbuh. Journal of Education Language and Innovation, 3(1), 22–33.

Ibrahim, A. S. (1993). Kajian Tindak Tutur. Usaha Nasional.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Pnelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putri, S. M., & Amir, A. (2024). Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas VII Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 1 Kota Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(2), 30378–30388.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Yule, G. (2014). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Liza, E. R., & Noveria, E. (2026). Tindak Tutur Direktif dan Strategi Bertutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Teks Tanggapan di Kelas VII SMP Negeri 38 Padang. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i1.132

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.