Bias Kognitif Halo Effect Dalam Audit : Tinjauan Sistematis Terhadap Dampaknya Pada Kualitas Audit Dan Profesionalisme Auditor

Authors

  • Nur Fadilah Hanifah Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Adhiya Mizvi Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Bobby Pratama Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Cahyani Putri Ayu Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Yulia Saftiana Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i1.101

Keywords:

Halo Effect, Cognitive Bias, Audit Judgment, Audit Quality, Professional Skepticism, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

THE HALO EFFECT COGNITIVE BIAS IN AUDITING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ITS IMPACT ON AUDIT QUALITY AND AUDITOR PROFESSIONALISM

This study examines the influence of the halo effect as a cognitive bias on audit judgment, audit quality, and auditors’ professional skepticism within the behavioral auditing perspective using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. A total of 20 recent peer-reviewed articles were systematically analyzed following PRISMA guidelines to identify patterns in how cognitive limitations and heuristic-based decision-making affect audit processes. The findings indicate that the halo effect reduces auditor objectivity by anchoring evaluations on initial impressions, leading to weakened professional skepticism and biased interpretation of audit evidence, which ultimately increases the risk of audit errors and affects audit quality. The review also highlights that this bias extends to technology-assisted audit environments, where reliance on automated systems may reinforce judgment distortions. Furthermore, the literature identifies debiasing strategies, including skepticism training, structured feedback, and decision aids, as effective mechanisms to mitigate bias. This study contributes to the literature by providing a structured synthesis of behavioral, cognitive, and audit quality perspectives, as well as offering practical insights for enhancing auditor judgment and professionalism in increasingly complex audit environments.

References

Abdallah, M. B. A., Ghanem, M. G., & Hijazi, W. H. (2024). Analyzing The Factors That Affect Auditor’s Judgment And Decision Making In Lebanese Audit Firms. Journal Of Risk And Financial Management, 17(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Jrfm17020073

Alexeyeva, I., & Sundgren, S. (2022). Do Going Concern Disclosures In The Management Report And Audit Report Signal Bankruptcy Risk? Evidence From Privately Held Firms. International Journal Of Auditing, 26(2), 171–192. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Ijau.12257

Camacho-Miñano, M. Del M., Muñoz-Izquierdo, N., Pincus, M., & Wellmeyer, P. (2024). Are Key Audit Matter Disclosures Useful In Assessing The Financial Distress Level Of A Client Firm? British Accounting Review, 56(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Bar.2023.101200

Campbell, C. A., Ramamoorti, S., & Calderon, T. G. (2023). Automation Bias And The “Goldilocks Effect” In Auditing Blockchain. Journal Of Emerging Technologies In Accounting, 20(2), 29–53. Https://Doi.Org/10.2308/JETA-2022-062

Friska, R., & Agustia, D. (2025). Enhancing Auditor Judgment Quality: A Review Of Evidence From Experimental Research. Journal Of Risk And Financial Management, 18(3). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Jrfm18030115

Georgiou, I., Sapuric, S., Lois, P., & Thrassou, A. (2024). Blockchain For Accounting And Auditing—Accounting And Auditing For Cryptocurrencies: A Systematic Literature Review And Future Research Directions. Journal Of Risk And Financial Management, 17(7). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Jrfm17070276

Hasibuan, F. A. K., Br Bukit, R., & Rini, E. S. (2022). The Effect Of Framing, Halo Effect And Auditor’s Experience On Audit Judgment (Study On Auditors Public Accountant Office (KAP) In Medan City). International Journal Of Research And Review, 9(9), 37–47. Https://Doi.Org/10.52403/Ijrr.20220905

Ilori, O., Joan Isibor, N., Iyabode Lawal, C., Christopher Friday, S., & Chukwuma-Eke, E. C. (2021). Enhancing Auditor Judgment And Skepticism Through Behavioral Insights: A Systematic Review. IRE Journals, 4(11), 357–373. Https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Publication/391739345

Khulsum, U., Suryanto, T., Ali, J., & Yudha Wardana, H. (2025). Breaking Barriers In Audit Quality: The Dynamic Interactions Of Competence, Time Budget Pressure, Complexity, And Motivation In Indonesia Landscape. Social Sciences And Humanities Open, 12(August), 101905. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ssaho.2025.101905

Koreff, J., & Hoang, H. (2025). Does Perceived Data Analytic Sophistication And Anticipated Supervisor Performance Evaluation Impact Auditors’ Decisions? Current Issues In Auditing , 19(2), 39–48. Https://Doi.Org/10.2308/CIIA-2023-035

Kraciuk, J., Kacperska, E. M., & Idzik, M. (2026). The Halo Effect As A Factor Influencing Consumer Trust In Innovative Technological Solutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 18(6). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su18062984

Lanero, A., Vázquez, J. L., & Sahelices-Pinto, C. (2021). Halo Effect And Source Credibility In The Evaluation Of Food Products Identified By Third-Party Certified Eco-Labels: Can Information Prevent Biased Inferences? Foods, 10(11). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Foods10112512

Liu, D., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2024). Comparable But Is It Informative?Accounting Information Comparability And Price Synchronicity. Journal Of Financial Stability, 73(January), 101297. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jfs.2024.101297

Lv, J., Sun, Z., Li, H., & Hou, Y. (2023). The Role Of Negative Perfectionism And The Relationship Between Critical Thinking And The Halo Effect: Insights From Corporate Managers In Human Resources. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7). Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Bs13070533

Maske, M. K., Sohn, M., & Hirsch, B. (2021). How Managerial Accountability Mitigates A Halo Effect In Managers’ Ex-Post Bonus Adjustments. Management Accounting Research, 51(December 2019), 100738. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Mar.2021.100738

Minutti-Meza, M. (2021). The Art Of Conversation: The Expanded Audit Report. Accounting And Business Research, 51(5), 548–581. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1932264

Muñoz-Izquierdo, N., Camacho-Miñano, M. Del M., Sánchez-Martín, M. Del P., & Pascual-Ezama, D. (2024). Is Auditor Financial Decision-Making Affected By Prior Audit Report Information? A Behavioral Approach. Heliyon, 10(10). Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Heliyon.2024.E30971

Rama, R. S., T, S., Saraswati, E., & Rahman, A. F. (2020). Debiasing Halo Effect: Auditor Reputation And The Role Of Auditing Learning On Financial Statements User Trust. International Research Journal Of Management, IT And Social Sciences, 7(6), 33–41. Https://Doi.Org/10.21744/Irjmis.V7n6.1006

Septian, I., & Astika, I. B. P. (2019). Halo Effect Moderating: Impact Of Professional Skepticism On Auditor Performance. International Research Journal Of Management, IT And Social Sciences, 6(4), 189–196. Https://Doi.Org/10.21744/Irjmis.V6n4.680

Utami, I., Kusuma, I. W., Gudono, G., & Supriyadi, S. (2017). Debiasing The Halo Effect In Audit Decision: Evidence From Experimental Study. Asian Review Of Accounting, 25(2), 211–241. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/ARA-10-2015-0105

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02

How to Cite

Nur Fadilah Hanifah, Mizvi, A., Pratama, B., Ayu, C. P., & Saftiana, Y. (2026). Bias Kognitif Halo Effect Dalam Audit : Tinjauan Sistematis Terhadap Dampaknya Pada Kualitas Audit Dan Profesionalisme Auditor. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1), 704–713. https://doi.org/10.33751/jmp.v14i1.101

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.